Uranium’s OPEC

May 10, 2017

In case you missed the news last week, Kazatomprom (the 100% state-owned utility) in Kazakhstan, has announced plans to create its own uranium trading arm. It will be deciding on an initial public offering of shares in the company in the first half of next year.

This is an interesting and very welcome announcement because the stated goal is for Kazatomprom to be actively involved in uranium trading,” in order to “gain more influence” over prices.

Bloomberg has likened the move to Kazakhstan wanting to be a one-country OPEC. It’s not a bad comparison in terms of market share. After all, OPEC’s members control around 40% of the World’s oil and Kazakhstan produces a similar percentage of the world’s uranium. 

However, I think a Kazakhstan-controlled trading arm has the potential to be far more powerful within the uranium markets than OPEC is in the oil markets.

The biggest reason is also the simplest: OPEC has thirteen members. That’s thirteen individual nation states, each with their own international agendas, their own domestic concerns.  When you consider how complex politics can get between two countries, just think what it’s like trying to form a consensus when thirteen are involved. It’s a wonder they can get anything done at all.

Kazakhstan doesn’t have that problem. It’s one country with a single, dominant national industry – uranium mining – and their goals are simple: maintain employment and maximize revenue. 

The country has an additional advantage: it’s the lowest cost producer of uranium in the world. It uses a particularly cheap version of heap-leaching, based on toxic chemicals, for production and it has all of the Soviet-era infrastructure in place. It’s therefore not vulnerable in the same way as OPEC has been, to the uranium equivalent of US-shale.

Kazatomprom has been clear that the trading arm will take time to set up.  Based on their comments I think next year is the most likely scenario.  Once that happens though, things could get very exciting. The uranium spot market is thin. Very thin. It really wouldn’t take that much to drive up prices and keep them up. Just look at what happened when Kazakhstan announced it would be reducing production. Now consider what they can achieve when they start throwing their weight around in terms of pricing.

The prospects for next year’s uranium market are moving upwards fast.

Dev Randhawa, CEO and Chairman of Fission

Forward-Looking Information: Some of the posted entries on the CEO Corner may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions which involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by them.  Examples of forward looking information and assumptions include future estimates of the worldwide supply and demand for uranium and the effect that these changes could have on the short term and long term price of uranium on the world markets, statements regarding the future operating or financial performance of Fission including the net present value, metal recoveries, capital costs, operating costs, production, rates of return and payback.  Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may not prove to be accurate.  Such statements are qualified in their entirety by the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations.  Among those factors which could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: market conditions and other risk factors listed from time to time in our reports filed with Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "projects", "plans", "anticipates" and similar expressions. These statements represent management's expectations or beliefs concerning, among other things, future operations and various components thereof affecting the economic performance of Fission. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements which are based upon management's assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the business risks discussed above, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers are cautioned that events or circumstances could cause results to differ materially from those predicted.

Links: Some of the posted entries on the CEO Corner may include links to 3rd party websites. Fission has not reviewed all websites linked to or from this Site and is not responsible for the contents of any such websites. The inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement by Fission of the linked website or its content. Use of any such linked website is at the user's own risk.

For further information we refer you to our legal notice.